Over the years - on this blog - we've discussed how neo-conservatives got it wrong when they said Iraqi oil would end up paying for the Iraq war. In the end, the Chinese and others signed those lucrative oil deals.
But, the following story - from The WASHINGTON POST - beautifully underscores the intrigue and complexity to bringing in Iraqi oil.
Case in point: A fully-loaded crude-oil tanker sits in the Gulf of Mexico off the Texas coast. It's not going anywhere, as the central government of Iraq and the Kurdish regional government battle over ownership. And of course the Obama Administration still publicly favors a united Iraq over the Kurdish separatists...
Why do we need Iraqi oil sitting off the Texas coast? That makes no sense since Texas has plenty of oil and plenty of job openings to go along with it.
Add your comment: Attention: In an attempt to promote a level of civility and personal
responsibility in blog discussions, we now require you to be a member of
the WDEL Members Only Group in order to post a comment. Your Members
Only Group username and password are required to process your post.
You can join the WDEL Members Only Group for free by clicking here.
If you are already a member but have forgotten your username or password, please
Please register your post with your WDEL Members Only Group username and password below.